Hi Powdersc, (and greetings to other readers too...)
Thanks for your feedback.
We hear ya on everything and only put those general
references in for those less understanding than
we all are here. We're sorry we even have to talk about
them, and we know you're not suggesting that at all,
that's a huge reason we value your (& everyone's) contributions
here so much.
Having an intelligent discussion about the Tremblant Alpine
experience will always have some healthy debate and we're
grateful for this type of quality conversation which is based on
reason, logic and respect for all.
Part of the problem with some social media is
that they feel that they need to slam others as
a way of supporting their own POV as ideal.
So then, theoretically, if you wanted to be totally "transparent"
you'd only list verifiable fact and no POV at all.
But....
When you are a dedicated "Fan" though, you are, by extension,
a "supporter", and as supporters we try to favour a positive
POV, just because life is so much better that way.
This is also why we feel it is much better to try to focus on
how to make the best positive utility of Tremblant, regardless of
why some decisions are made, and as previously mentioned, all
Official Info/explanations that lead to better understanding, are
welcome.
We guess, if there was a message in all this, it's that positive,
user-friendly information is almost always helpful, from all sources.
Is it just a coincidence this morning 1/25/11 that there are
ZERO progressive openings on 89 open runs!
So then ... What runs are we gunna carve up first?!